Total Pageviews

Monday, February 11, 2013

In Defence of Sugar



Sugar is apparently the latest target for the food Nazis. There were calls last week for additional tax on sugary pop.  At first, I thought that’s not a bad idea.  I have met young people in the past totally addicted to a well-known brown fizzy drink and symptoms included obesity, depression and low self esteem.  But then I thought, hang on a sec.  Just because that person got fed too much pop by his well-meaning but not well-informed parents, does that mean the rest of us that want an occasional caffeine boost in a sugar-based drink should also pay more?  I also think it’s quite expensive enough for coloured water. In some settings such as posh pubs and cinemas, it costs the equivalent of a pint of beer. Surely it’s better to make sure people have the facts so they can make intelligent choices rather than saying ‘that’s bad for you so we’re going to make it really expensive’. And of course the extra money would go to the government, which would more likely fund obese Tories than public health and education.  As with all indirect taxes, this hits the less well-off more of course.

At the weekend the madness extended to all products containing sugar, including sugar itself. As if the poor beleaguered shopper doesn’t have enough to worry about with the horse meat scandal. Yes, we know food producers put sugar in food to make it taste nicer and it’s our choice whether we buy it or not.  One loony commentator actually blamed sugar alone for all the obesity problems we face.  Nothing to do with eating too much or not moving enough or not having a balance diet or anything else.  No!  Just sugar!

Okay, I realise that any nutritionist will tell you that intrinsically sugar has no nutritional value whatsoever.  But that’s not why we eat it.  Without sounding too self-righteous I am not a massive consumer of processed food products (because I know they put loads of unknown stuff in and I really do prefer freshly made food given the choice) but I do eat things like shop-bought yogurt, muesli and fruit juice knowing full well there is sugar in them and I will also confess to the occasional pork pie or lamb grill (no horse – I checked).  But if I want the actual taste of sugar I WILL DAMN WELL HAVE SUGAR! 

Again, I am not a massive consumer and may only indulge a few times a week but a life totally without any cake, sweets, biscuits and especially chocolates would suck.  Just because some people can’t have a packet of biscuits in the house without immediately scoffing the lot, why should I pay more?  We eat sweet things because they taste nice!  Now all of a sudden sugar is worse than fat or carbohydrate because it’s not a ‘proper food’.  That may technically be true but when consciously trying to lose weight in the past, I found that if I cut out sugar completely it was very hard.  Some people may be happy on a bland diet of rice cakes and carrots but I for one am not.  What is the point of living if you can’t have the odd bit of sugar?  I also became an expert at calorie counting and know that eating a couple of sweets or chocolates for example, is fewer calories than a piece of pie or cake (even the diet stuff) and I felt like I’d had something sweet and that was enough to satisfy me.  If sugar is so addictive how come we still have chocolates in boxes in our house from Christmas? Comparing it to nicotine or other drugs is ridiculous.  Did anyone actually ever die directly of a sugar overdose?  And if that is true, then why was nicotine not banned centuries ago?  Because it raises too much revenue for the government of course.  And another thing - if sugar alone is responsible for all the fat problems in society, wouldn’t we all be seriously overweight rather than just a third of us?

As mentioned I am especially partial to chocolates (but manage to exercise self-restraint and not scoff them continuously - sic) and the odd bit of cake. I do occasionally like actual sweets but normally only eat them on holiday (it’s essential when flying I find, to suck on a boiled sweet to help with the drop in air pressure) and when I am feeling poorly.  I actually think that sugar can be good for you when you are unwell.  I have done a bit of research on this (well, 5 mins on Google) and can find no conclusive proof to back up my view.  Some call white refined sugar ‘white death’ whilst conceding that sugar in some forms including honey, does have anti-viral and ant-bacterial properties.  Believe what you will, but don’t impose those views on me.  

My mantra as always is: ‘Nothing is intrinsically bad for you, but all things in moderation’.  

Get off my sugar you Fascists!